Reason for New Zealand Earthquake

Scientists: Location near major city is a major reason for New Zealand earthquake devastation

The Canadian PressBy Alicia Chang, The Associated Press | The Canadian Press – Tue, 22 Feb, 2011 6:14 PM EST

LOS ANGELES, Calif. – The latest New Zealand earthquake was a deadly combination of distance, depth and timing.

While weaker than the one that rocked the area last September, it did more damage and cost lives, primarily because of its location.

Tuesday’s magnitude-6.3 quake was centred about 3 miles (5 kilometres) from the populated hub ofChristchurch, toppling buildings, killing dozens and trapping others. It was also only about 3 miles (5 kilometres) deep and occurred during the middle of a workday when commercial buildings were filled with employees.

The jolt “is squarely beneath the city itself,” said seismologist Egill Hauksson of the California Institute of Technology. “All the old historic buildings are being shaken more violently than they were built to withstand.”

Scientists classified it as an aftershock of the powerful magnitude-7 that struck last Sept. 4.

No one died in that early morning quake — which was 11 times stronger — mainly because it was centred farther away, about 30 miles (48 kilometres) west of the city centre. It was also twice as deep as Tuesday’s aftershock. Shallower quakes tend to be more damaging.

While New Zealand has strict building codes, Christchurch has a number of pre-World War II buildings that were badly damaged by the September quake, which also triggered landslides in the area.

Another reason why this latest quake was more deadly is because buildings that were previously weakened by ground shaking were more likely to suffer damage or even collapse this time around, said Tom Jordan, who heads the Southern California Earthquake Center.

Since September, about half a dozen aftershocks greater than magnitude-5 have rattled Christchurch. Tuesday’s was the largest aftershock to date.

“You can have an aftershock months after the main shock,” said geophysicist Paul Earle of the U.S. Geological Survey in Golden, Colorado. “Just because a few months have gone by doesn’t mean you can’t have a large, damaging earthquake.”



U.S. Geological Survey:



Tagged: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: